Whitehorse’s GIS-based, Multi-Criteria Evaluation Tool for Crosswalk Prioritization
The City of Whitehorse is working with residents to improve pedestrian infrastructure and safety. A sophisticated decision-making tool for prioritizing improvements to pedestrian and cyclist crossing locations was developed to facilitate discussions regarding community decisions, while at the same time providing a defendable, evidence-based and replicable system of outcomes.
In recent years, several planning and implementation processes were implemented to address pedestrian safety concerns. However, design inconsistencies and a reactive approach to crosswalk improvement were still predominant while lacking considerations for transportation equity and pedestrian mobility principals when evaluating and prioritizing crosswalk interventions.
Traditional network screening methods for road safety applications rely almost exclusively on collision data (frequency, rates and severity) and resident's complaints. This project aimed to expand those criteria to include equity, accessibility, pedestrian connectivity and proximity to community assets and social services. The data was integrated into a workable multi-criteria assessment framework with available municipal GIS data.
A Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Tool
Morrison Hershfield collaborated with the City of Whitehorse to develop a consistent decision-making tool for prioritizing improvements to existing and new pedestrian and cyclist crossing locations across the City’s road network. This GIS based Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) approach enables stakeholders to engage in discussions regarding community decisions, while providing a defendable, evidence-based and replicable system of outcomes. The study also provided information for crossing design review best practices so that pedestrian controls are consistent with national standards.
“Our team quickly identified the significant potential in using and manipulating available Big Data to better prioritize the City’s future transportation improvements based on traditional methods plus emerging equity considerations,” notes Andres Baez, Senior Transportation Engineer.
Using GIS for Analysis
Geographic Information System (GIS) was instrumental in the development of the MCDA tool, serving as a geodatabase for data analysis, criteria evaluation and visualization of results. GIS was used throughout all phases of the assessment to map the data needed to accurately assess any given area. The GIS overlay geodatabase for analysis included:
A Successful Innovation
Want to know more?
If you are interested in using a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) tool for prioritizing improvements to pedestrian and cyclist crossing locations or seeking more information about the tool, please contact Andres Baez, Senior Transportation Planning Engineer: Abaez@morrisonhershfield.com.